Two sets of one-degree-long focus scans were obtained on the night of 980919 UT at the 2MASS North facility at Mt. Hopkins. This test was the seventh of several iterative tests to recheck telescope focus and collimation at the start of post-summer shutdown.
Two focus runs (Run 13-14) were obtained in a similar fashion to those
obtained on 980914n, 980915n, 980916n, 980918n (Runs 1-12):
The raw data for the focus test scans were processed during
the 24hr QA/Tape validation processing at IPAC on 980919 (PDT) using 2MAPPS
v2.1. Scan 59 of Run 14 failed processing so only pfrac values are available.
J Band (Run 13)
H Band (Run 13)
K Band (Run 13)
J Band (Run 14)
H Band (Run 14)
K Band (Run 14)
Scan 52:
Scan 53:
Scan 54:
Scan 55:
Scan 56:
Scan 57:
Scan 58:
The focus table and curves indicate that best focus during Run 13 (coarse
steps) occurred near a focus of 2045 in H and Ks (scan 055), and
approximately 2035-2040 in J (between scans 054 and 055). Note that
the image symmetry is maximized (i.e. second moment ratio closest to
unity) in the Ks band in scan 055, but at a slightly lower focus setting
for J and H. Although there remains some measureable image
elongation in the Ks band, as manifested in the image moment ratio
plots, the slope of the second moment ratio curves are significantly flatter
than measured any time before. The psf maps show that there is
image elongation in all three bands, but the position angle is
+/-45 deg, which makes the second moment ratio a poor diagnostic.
In any case, the effective "depth-of-focus" to image elongation
appears significantly improved.
The second, finer stepped focus test results are problematic.
The first three scans of Run 14 are consistent with Run 13.
However, there appears to be a jump to systemmatically poorer
values of PFRAC and shape for scans 062-065. This is most
likely due to a degradation in the seeing. We note that the
image moment ratios track perfectly in the two tests. Becuase of
the jump in the curves, it is not possible to estimate a best-focus
position from this scan test, except to say that the image symmetry
profile is consistent with the coarser stepped test.
The cross-stepped psf-maps show the psf to be highly consistent
across the focal plane in all three bands, even when the telescope
is far from optimal focus. This is confirmed by the psf-fit/aperture
mag difference versus cross-scan position plots. The worst cross-scan
photometric bias even +/-30 microns out of focus is probably <5%,
and at best focus, it is negligible in all three bands.
In general, the image elongation problem in the Ks band has been
vastly improved. It has come at the cost of slightly reduced image
quality in the J band. How much worse the J images are is difficult
too gauge because the seeing quality during these tests was not ideal.
However, the new collimation setting has provided much more tolerance
in focus setting to image elongation in all three bands. Another focus
test should be made in the near future under better seeing conditions.
scn focus Tel_T Rng_T Jrat Hrat Krat Jsh Hsh Ksh Jpfrc Hpfrc Kpfrc
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Run 13:
052 +1953 18.9 18.1 1.018 1.045 1.170 1.323 1.312 1.267 0.3656 0.3647 0.3764
053 +1982 18.9 18.1 0.994 1.031 1.174 1.147 1.143 1.122 0.4856 0.5088 0.5235
054 +2013 18.9 18.0 0.976 0.994 1.114 1.077 1.068 1.035 0.5640 0.6165 0.6260
055 +2043 18.9 18.0 0.962 0.971 1.002 1.077 1.053 1.016 0.5755 0.6267 0.6583
056 +2073 18.8 17.9 0.944 0.945 0.917 1.105 1.069 1.023 0.5340 0.6015 0.6395
057 +2103 18.8 17.9 0.916 0.914 0.829 1.147 1.103 1.053 0.4684 0.5607 0.5730
058 +2135 18.9 17.9 1.028 0.891 0.724 1.221 1.190 1.124 0.3606 0.4483 0.4485
Run 14:
059 +2001 18.9 17.9 UNDEF UNDEF UNDEF UNDEF UNDEF UNDEF 0.5622 0.5974 0.5985
060 +2018 18.9 18.0 0.983 0.998 1.089 1.094 1.075 1.050 0.5669 0.6203 0.6296
061 +2031 18.9 18.0 0.964 0.977 1.047 1.080 1.056 1.024 0.5726 0.6368 0.6488
062 +2046 18.8 17.9 0.965 0.968 0.993 1.133 1.099 1.064 0.5202 0.5819 0.6130
063 +2061 18.8 18.0 0.950 0.950 0.948 1.138 1.101 1.050 0.5065 0.5710 0.6131
064 +2077 18.9 18.0 0.949 0.941 0.910 1.160 1.112 1.065 0.4882 0.5628 0.5981
065 +2092 18.9 18.0 0.932 0.934 0.869 1.189 1.144 1.082 0.4557 0.5414 0.5666
R. Cutri & R. Hurt - IPAC
Last update - 19 September 1998