(970214)
This work represents our first efforts to verify the functionality and design of the Low Central Surface Brightness Galaxy Detector (or algorithm 2) component of GALWORKS. Since the GALWORKS package was ready for full scale tests > sans real 3-channel data (as of late 1996), we 'created' a 3-channel dataset using a set of scans (039 to 044, corresponding to the K scans) from the prototype camera 1995 observing run. This memo describes some of the key algorithm 2 results from these "3-channel" tests.
The quality in the SA 57 scans is rather poor (e.g., poor seeing at
J and H) and consequently is not a very good test bed for
Algorithm 2 -- the LCSB detector. The major goals of this
study were to build the sort of analysis tools that will be used
wth real 3-channel data, and to shed light on some of the problems
that are unique to low surface brightness extended objects. Finally,
the reader has a chance to become familiar with key
algorithm 2 features .
Detection and parameterization of low central surface brightness objects are described in the GALWORKS SDS section describing algorithm 2:
The following set of images comprise the LCSB galaxies found
in the SA57 scans. The objects have been checked against the
DSS or POSS images and /or NED to confirm their extended
extragalactic nature.
The first column is the J band image, second column the H band image, third column the K band image and the fourth column is the DSS optical image. The light blue circular contour represents the radius = 10 area, and the dark blue contour the "flux growth" circular area. Sources that had been "subtracted" from the object fields are circled in red with the size of the circle given by the subtraction radius. Sources circled with a green circle/ellipse represent sources that were previously processed and subsequently blanked from the object field.
The following set of images comprise the falsely classified LCSB galaxies found in the SA57 scans. Notice several instances of K-band detections (with K mag < 14) where no J or H or DSS equivalents are seen. Either these are cases of airglow blobs (localized to a few pixels) or a set of 3-sigma proximal noise bumps conspire to form a source (statistically we estimate that this event is probable given the 6 square degree coverage).
Other false LCSB galaxies are faint stars that have
gone slightly "fuzzy" probably due to a severe change in seeing conditions
(particulary at J and H).
The following plots/figures contain information with regard to the various parameters computed for LCSB objects. Here is a brief glossary of the nomenclature and terms.
The object flux is computed by integrating either circular or elliptical
apertures that are sequentially increased in size until the
flux growth "converges" as measured by either of two indicators:
(2) the change in mean surface brightness between adjacent aperture-annuli is less than (-3 * sigma), where sigma is the standard deviation of the background counts in the annulus corresponding to a radius = 15 pixels; this criterion is designed to minimized confusion from stars and from background gradients (e.g., nearby extended sources).
JHK: CSB and C5SB
JHK: BSNR
JHK: TSNR
"SUPER" SNR: S2SNR, S4SNR, S8SNR, SSNRMAX

It can be seen from the K band contribution, there is a population of
false LCSB galaxies that have a very low central surface brightness, as compared
to the confirmed galaxies and "unknown" objects. These false sources are low
surface brightness blobs with hardly any discernable peak brightness. Other than
these objects, the galaxies and false detections are more or less degenerate
in this phase space.

The dashed blue line represents the threshold that was imposed upon
detection: Objects with BSNR < 4 were considered non-detections. This
threshold is imposed to minimize contamination from faint stars.
For the objects that survive this cut,
the confirmed galaxies, false detections and unknown objects are
degenerate in this phase space.

Again the population of K-band blobs (false LCSB galaxies) stand
apart from real galaxies and the unknown objects. The
these blobs are not centrally condenced and they integrate up to something
rather bright (K < 14). There is some suggestion at J and H that the
false detections have lower SNRs (systematically) from the confirmed galaxies.
Only better quality data can confirm this trend.



Most of the confirmed galaxies have SSNRMAX values greater than
7 or 8, while many false detections have values less than this limit,
particulary at K (the K-band blobs have very low SSNR values).
For the individual SSNR values, S2SNR, S4SNR and S8SNR, it is not
clear if galaxies separate from stars. SSNRMAX looks the most promising
of the SNR parameters to distinguish stars from galaxies. Only better
quality data and further testing can confirm this conclusion.
The quality of the data is not good enough to draw many firm conclusions.
If we take the results at face value, we claim the following:
(1) We detect about 32 LCSB galaxies within 6 scans (or six square degrees)
toward the galactic pole. Most of these objects are very faint, from 3 to 5
sigma detections.
(2) Another 20 or so LCSB candidates do not appear to be real galaxies; they are either faint stars, or they are noise bumps ("blobs", actually) that do not have a counterpart on the DSS. Most false detections are very faint, < 5 sigma. The K-band blobs are, however, fairly bright with integrated mags between 13.5 and 14.0 (with very little central condensation).
(3) The reliability of this sample is approximately 50%, for SNR > 3.
(4) The initial detection cut using the BSNR parameter appears to filter out most stars and false detections. The remaining LCSB candidates appear to be for the most part degenerate in the parameter phase space used in GALWORKS. Of the parameters discussed in this memo, CSB, CS5B, BSNR, TSNR, "sh", S2SNR, S4SNR, S8SNR, SSNRMAX, the most promising phase space to separate LCSB galaxies from stars (and otherwise) appears to be through TSNR and SSNR. Further testing with higher quality data is required.