Elliptical Galaxies
as Absolute Calibration Sources

We analyze IRAC observations of large elliptical galaxies with the ultimate goal to derive the extended source calibration for resolved bjects. The analysis includes a detailed comparison with a set of SED templates and spectra that represent the NIR/MIR light distribution of elliptical galaxies.


Method

Extended source calibration depends on the source size and spectral shape. The goal is to create aperture (flux) corrections based on these parameters. To begin the process, we elect to start with the simplest cases, moving on to more challenging cases as our knowledge of these calibration issues increases. The simplest extended sources to model and analyze are early-type elliptical galaxies, whose dust-free starlight is well understood in the near and mid-infrared window.

Elliptical Galaxies

Early-type elliptical galaxies have very homogeneus properties, resulting in smooth, featureless spectral energy distributions that are dominated by the evolved luminous population. Ellipticals and spheroids have low star formation, minimal dust content, and relatively high surface brightness. Single burst population synthesis models do an adequate job of describing the mid-infrared properties of elliptical galaxies.

Photometry & Measurements

The mid-infrared IRAC imaging comes from GTO, SINGS and Spitzer-IST programs. The IRAC images are convolved with the 2MASS PSF so that direct comparison can be made at small radii (reliable photometry should be possible for r > 3 arcsec).

2MASS mosaic imaging is obtained from the Large Galaxy Atlas (Jarrett et al 2003) and IRAC mosaic imaging from the SSC archive and from special calibration observations. Foreground (Milky Way) stars are removed from the images. Photometry is carried out using a nested set of circular (or elliptical, where noted: the shape of the photometry aperture is not critical, as either circular or elliptical apertures may be used) apertures centered on the brightest part of the nucleus (note: since ellptical galaxies are dominated by starlight from the evolved population, the near-infrared and mid-infrared positions will be identical). The background light offset is removed. Local background is estimated using an annulus that encircles the target, located just beyond the last aperture used to measure the flux of the target. The measurements are flux calibrated using the zero-point mag in header of the 2MASS images and using the standard (point source) flux calibration for IRAC.

Spectral Energy Distribution

We construct the elliptical galaxy SED from near-infrared measurements (2MASS) and mid-infrared measurements (IRAC). Integrated flux measurements are in units of flux density. The model SEDs are then fit to the galaxy SEDs using the K-band (2.2 µm) measurement. In some cases we have corrected the photometry for cosmic reddening (the k-correction).

Tenets:

That is, we assume the near-infrared 2MASS light represents ground truth. Any deviations that are seen for the IRAC measurements compared to the E-galaxy model SED represent discrepancies in the IRAC flux calibration.

Models

We will be comparing IRAC photometric measurements with the expected light distribution of an old galaxy (t = 11 & 13 Gyrs) derived from the Bruzual & Charlot (2003) and GRASIL population synthesis, respectivelhy. Additional templates are shown below, including versions with AGB dusty shell populations (e.g. the Piovan models A&A 408, 559). Finally, two galaxies in the sample (N1404 and N4552) are from SINGS, which therefore includes high quality IRS SL spectra (from 5um and longward). In order to match the SED templates, we've normalized the SINGS spectra (which have units of MJy/sr) by the *expected* K-band SB, as deduced from "old" galaxy SED comparing K-band to the 8um window (see table below).


Elliptical Galaxy Model Templates
after normalization in the K-band (2.2 µm); three spectra are included: K2III, M0III, M2.5III; and equivalent IRAC photometric points shown with magenta triangles (derived from the templates and M-giant spectra). Also shown is the IRS-SL spectrum for the SINGS galaxy NGC1404. Here are the same templates overlayed with ISOPHOT-S results for a set of ellipticals (some of which have IRAS dust emission); data comes from Nanyao Lu (2006). Finally, here is a set of templates that include a dusty late-type galaxy to demonstrate PAH emission bands in the MIR.
Relative Spectral Response of an Elliptical Galaxy
with 2MASS and Spitzer filters

bandwavelengthf/f_K
J1.251.020
H1.651.239
K2.181.000
13.60.473
24.50.302
35.80.204
48.00.125
The following set of templates show the effect of adding a (relatively) young population of evolved (AGB) stars with dusty shells. The younger the population, the bigger the effect (i.e., MIR emission in the long IRAC bands). Finally, here is the 10.2 Gyr AGB with the SINGS IRS-SL spectrum for NGC1404 & NGc4552 overlayed. I've normalized the SINGS spectrum assuming a K-band to 8um flux ratio consistent with ellipticals (see table to the left).

**The assumption that elliptical galaxies are completely dust-free is not true for all galaxies in the sample, but it does seem likely that most of the sample is dust free (based on the SINGS spectroscopy and MIPS imaging.) However, if it turns out that AGB dust is present in the bulk of the sample, then the results will be severely compromised (as the AGB models seen above are abundantly clear) and the extended source aperture corrections wil be systematically too large.**




Galaxy Photometry Results

The following table summarizes the flux calibration results for 13 galaxies analyzed in detail. The results include detailed SEDs and IRS SL spectra (when available) for each galaxy.

galaxy morph rk20fe rktot IRAC 1,2,4 IRAC 1,2,4
stars removed
Curve
Growth
Integrated
Flux
Differential
Flux (SB)
comment
SWIRE-1 E? 5.0 7.3 --- 3-color image cgrowth SED
flux ratio
differential
flux (SB)
2MASXJ10470884+5904513; axis ratio = 0.77, p.a. = 48 deg; here is the WIRC Ks-band image; estimated photometric redshift = 0.09 based on the NIR shift; here is the raw SED without redshift (note the too faint J and H measurements).
IC815 E1 13.4 32.1 3-color image 3-color image cgrowth SED
flux ratio
differential
flux (SB)
IRAC-IST observations; redshift = 0.045
NGC4687 E1 18.7 45.1 3-color image 3-color image cgrowth SED
flux ratio
differential
flux (SB)
IRAC-IST observations; Redshift = 0.014
ESO507_G046 E2 24.3 51.0 3-color image 3-color image cgrowth SED
flux ratio
differential
flux (SB)
IRAC-IST observations; bright S0 galaxy nearby;
for large radii, fluxes are systematically contaminated; redshift = 0.015.
NGC6703 SA0- 49.1 70.35 3-color image 3-color image cgrowth SED
flux ratio
differential
flux (SB)
IRAC GTO program
NGC777 E1; Sy2 51.1 73.1 3-color image 3-color image cgrowth SED
flux ratio
differential
flux (SB)
IRAC GTO program
NGC1199 E3 55.3 115.1 3-color image

w/24um convolution

3-color image

w/24um convolution

--- SED
flux ratio

w/ 24um convolution

differential
flux (SB)

w/ 24um convolution

HCG22 compact group; Kelsey Johnson data; axis ratio = 0.8.
NGC5044 E0 61.1 85.93 3-color image 3-color image cgrowth SED
flux ratio
differential
flux (SB)
IRAC-IST observations
NGC1404 * E1 82.5 151.8 3-color image 3-color image cgrowth SED
flux ratio
differential
flux (SB)
SINGS galaxy; bright star to the south-east
NGC0584 * E4 88.2 162.5 3-color image 3-color image cgrowth SED
flux ratio
differential
flux (SB)
SINGS galaxy; ellipticity = 0.35; photometry measured with ellipse apertures
NGC5846 E0-1; liner 94.0 190.3 3-color image 3-color image cgrowth SED
flux ratio
differential
flux (SB)
IRAC GTO program; S0 companion
NGC4552 (M89) * E; Sy2 88.0 197.9 3-color image 3-color image cgrowth SED
flux ratio
differential
flux (SB)
SINGS galaxy; dust is likely in the nuke;
note the 70 µm signal
NGC4649 (M60) E2 145.0 241.5 3-color image 3-color image cgrowth SED
flux ratio
differential
flux (SB)
IRAC GTO program; spiral companion; images too small to capture total flux
NGC4472 (M49) E2; Sy2 179.2 313.4 3-color image 3-color image cgrowth SED
flux ratio
differential
flux (SB)
huge galaxy; IRAC images are way too small to cover field

* denotes sources with IRS spectral measurements.



Extended Source Aperture Correction Results


IRAC-1 (3.5 µm) extended source correction factors for the galaxy sample. The magenta line denotes "swire-1".

IRAC-2 (4.5 µm) extended source correction factors for the galaxy sample. The magenta line denotes "swire-1".

IRAC-3 (5.8 µm) extended source correction factors for the galaxy sample. N4552 is discrepant due to the presence of dust (PAH emission). The magenta line denotes "swire-1".

IRAC-4 (8.0 µm) extended source correction factors for the galaxy sample. N4552 is discrepant due to the presence of dust (PAH emission). The magenta line denotes "swire-1".

IRAC-1 (3.5 µm) extended source correction factors combined; points with error bars represent the median and RMS in the sample. The doted line denotes N4552 (dusty elliptical). The magenta line denotes "swire-1".

IRAC-2 (4.5 µm) extended source correction factors combined; points with error bars represent the median and RMS in the sample. The dotted line denotes N4552 (dusty elliptical). The magenta line denotes "swire-1".

IRAC-3 (5.8 µm) extended source correction factors combined; points with error bars represent the median and RMS in the sample. The dotted line denotes N4552 (dusty elliptical). The magenta line denotes "swire-1".

IRAC-4 (8.0 µm) extended source correction factors combined; points with error bars represent the median and RMS in the sample. The dotted line denotes N4552 (dusty elliptical). The magenta line denotes "swire-1".



Extended Source Aperture Correction


Further Analysis & Links


Last updated by T. Jarrett on April 12, 2007