2MASS Survey and Calibration Working Databases




UNDER CONSTRUCTION

I. Introduction

As part of the 2MASS Extended Mission, the point and extended source Working Databases (WDBs) from the Survey and Calibration scans are to be released to the user community. The release of these data sets will enable users to: 1) conduct research in the time domain with 2MASS, studying time variability and proper motion; and 2) utilize near infrared measurements of sources fainter than the SNR limits used to construct the All-Sky Release Catalogs.

II. Contents of the Working Databases

Nightly 2MASS data processing generated lists of positions and photometry for all "sources" extracted from survey and calibration Tile scans that were loaded into point and extended source WDBs. Table 1 contains the number of extractions contained in each of the WDBs, and the number of scans from which they were derived.

Table 1 - Number of Scans and Extractions in the Survey and Calibration Working Databases
WDBNo. ScansNo. Point SrcsNo. Extended Srcs
Survey70,7121,314981,8672,590,500
Calibration 73,230191,464,020403,811

The All-Sky Release PSC and XSC were drawn from the much more extensive Survey WDBs with the goal of producing the highly uniform, reliable and complete catalogs that were the main deliverables from the primary 2MASS mission. In addition to the subset of sources that comprised the PSC and XSC, the WDBs contain:

The Calibration WDBs contain the same mix of extractions as the Survey WDBs, but will contain a much higher proportion of multiply-detected real sources because of the high degree of redundancy on the observations. Other than the photometry and positions of the standard stars in each of the fields, none of the Calibration WDB data have been released directly.

Links to Analysis Reports of 2MASS WDBs

Links to Analysis Reports of 2MASS Final Products

III. Preparing the WDBs for Release

1. Scope of the Release Products


2. Databases Updates

Status of Survey and Calibration WDB Preparation

IV. Merging the WDBs

Approximately 30% of the sky was observed two or more times under nominally photometric conditions during the course of the main Survey. About half of this area was covered in the Tile overlap regions and the other half was comprised of Tiles observed multiple times for validation or to seek improvements in sky conditions. Figures 1 and 2 show a histogram of the number of observations of Survey Tiles and the cumulative distribution of area on the sky as a function of observation epochs, respectively. In addition, ~5.5 deg2 covered by the 40 calibration Tiles was scanned between 240 and ~3700 times during the Survey.

The process of merging the WDBs refers to grouping together positionally all measurements of near infrared sources, within the limitations of source motion and extraction confusion and scan boundaries. Grouping and linking the extractions will provide the following:

Figure 1 - Histogram of Tile observations Figure 2 - Cumulative distribution of area
as a function of number of times observed

1. The Merging Process

Merging the source extractions is done by positionally autocorrelating the Working DBs. The matching radius should be as small as possible to minimize false associations, yet large enough to take into account position reconstruction uncertainties on the faintest sources. A 2" matching radius was used for duplicate source resolution when generating the PSC, and 5" was used for the XSC. The proximity distributions for the PSC and XSC show abrupt upturns in the proximity distributions of the catalogs at ~3" and 5", respectively.

It is desirable that the merging results are independent of the order in which sources are encountered in the WDB lists.

2. Limitations

The merging process is limited by several factors:

3. Quantities to Derive from the Merged Groups



4. How Should Merged DBs be presented?



V. Reliability Scoring

Because a significant fraction of the extractions in the WDBs are likely not real, it is imperative that each extraction be accompanied by some estimate of reliability. This will be especially critical if we choose to release all entries in the WDBs. In addition to all of the reliability-related flags and scores that are derived for each "source", it is proposed that we derive a "reliability score" (0 to 9 with 9 being best and 0 being worst) that relates to the probability that a WDB entry corresponds to a true astrophysical source that was at the reported position at th time of the observation.

This flag is not intended to necessarily encode whether or not the flux and/or position measurement is within some accuracy since there are other flux quality flags and position uncertainties.

The reliability score may be based on, but not be limited to, the following attributes:




Last Updated: 14 April 2004
R. Cutri - IPAC