980304n s133 MAPCOR Simulations
980304n Scan 133 Simulation Results




Introduction

In an attempt to quantify the affect on photometry due to contamination from bright star diffraction spikes and confusion, Rae Stiening has generated a set of simulated raw Ks survey data by placing 8 artifical stars around a Ks=8.0 mag primary in an existing 2MASS scan. Here is Rae's description:


8/9/2000

I am sending to holly:/k2/ftp/north at this time substitutes for scan
k0369133.rdo in which 8 guest stars have been added.  The 8 guest stars
have been added equally spaced on a circle of radius 17 NICMOS pixels
(about 34 arc seconds).  The parent star is at the center of the circle
of guest star clones.  It is an 8th K magnitude star at 13h34m21.95s
+30d29m20.7s. The files are named as follows:

kfakmag09.rdo	guest stars are  9th magnitude
kfakmag13.rdo	guest stars are 13th magnitude
kfakmag14.rdo   guest stars are 14th magnitude
kfakmag15.rdo   guest stars are 15th magnitude

The guest stars are in six frames including frame 243.  The compressed
image on the IPAC image surver is called ki1330244.fits.

Four of the guest stars are located so that they will be contaminated
by the diffraction spikes of the parent.  (though not much)

So lets run these scans and see what happens.

Rae

8/14/2000

The following Admirals' Club variants of k0369133.rdo are enroute to
holly.  I didn't fix the missing star problem so for the north star we
may have to account for 5/6 images on some of these runs.

KFKMAG16.RDO
KFKMAG17.RDO
The above to data sets continue the 17 pixel radius star cluster down
	to the detection threshold.  Cluster magnitudes are indicated
	in the file names.

KFLMAG09.RDO
KFLMAG13.RDO
KFLMAG14.RDO
KFLMAG15.RDO
KLFMAG16.RDO
The above data have a 8 pixel radius star cluster with the magnitudes
indicated in the file names.

KFMMAG09.RDO
KFMMAG13.RDO
The above two files have a 5 pixel radius star cluster with the
magnitudes indicated in the file names.

Rae

8/16/2000

I'm sending two more Admiral's club runs to holly:/k2/ftp/north.  These
are a 5 pixel radius circle at 14th and 15th magnitude.  This just
extends the range of contaminated stars fainter.  (we only did 13 so far)
Rae

The runs are kfmmag14.rdo and kfmmag15.rdo



Two more fake data files are being sent to holly:/k2/ftp/north.

KFD1.RDO	5 pixel radius circle  15 pixels displaced from
			parent 8th magnitude star.
KFD2.RDo	5 pixel radius circle -15 pixels displaced from
			parent 8th magnitude star.

Rae


Processing

The modified Ks *.rdo files were combined with the corresponding real J and H *.rdo files for this scan and run through the operational 2MAPPS system using the appropriate flat and dark data for that night.

Original Results

The following image shows the Ks Atlas Image from the original scan 133.

The bright star in the above image has a calibrated magnitude of Ks=8.001+.039. Its reconstructed RA and DEC are 203.591498 +30.489037 (J2000).

17 Pixel Separation Results

The following images show Ks Atlas Images with the artifical stars of different brightnesses placed at 17 pixel (34") separation from the primary star.

All of the artificial stars were detected in the standard pipeline point source lists down to the 15th magnitude set. Half of the 16th magnitude apparitions were detected and none of the 17th magnitude stars were found. The table below shows the extracted positions and Ks magnitudes for each source in each image. Since there were no simulations added to the J or H data, there were of course no detections (except for the original primary star). The rows in the following table correspond to primary and 8 simulated sources; the artificial stars are desribed by their directional offset from the master source. The sets of columns (ra,dec,mag,msig) correspond to the positions, Ks mag and magnitude uncertainty in run. The suffix describes the run (0=original data, 09=9th mag simulated sources, 13=13th mag simulated sources, etc.).

Note that although the photometry listed for the primary star in the original scan is calibrated, the simulated scan data did not have calibrations applied. Therefore, a small photometric zero point offset of ~+0.034 mag should be added to the simulated star photometry to restore the original calibration.

| src |   ra09   |  dec09   | mag09|msig09|  ra13    |  dec13   | mag13|msig13|  ra14    |  dec14   | mag14|msig14|  ra15    |  dec15   | mag15|msig15|   ra16   |  dec16   | mag16|msig16|   ra17   |  dec17   | mag17|msig17|
| char|double|double| double   |  double  |double|double| double   |  double  |double|double| double   |  double  |double|double| double   |  double  |double|double| double   |  double  |double| double   |  double  |double|
master 203.591491 +30.489061  7.979 0.038  203.591491 +30.489059  7.961 0.039  203.591480 +30.489065  7.959 0.037  203.591478 +30.489069  7.967 0.038  203.591483 +30.489065  7.965 0.038  203.591477 +30.489073  7.982 0.038
N      203.591586 +30.498455  9.166 0.035  203.591586 +30.498484 13.150 0.050  203.591544 +30.498489 14.130 0.079  203.591564 +30.498461 15.106 0.167    0.000000  +0.000000  0.000 0.000    0.000000  +0.000000  0.000 0.000
NE     203.599224 +30.495661  8.992 0.036  203.599237 +30.495682 12.942 0.045  203.599208 +30.495695 13.881 0.067  203.599218 +30.495674 14.770 0.121    0.000000  +0.000000  0.000 0.000    0.000000  +0.000000  0.000 0.000
E      203.602395 +30.489035  8.981 0.036  203.602402 +30.489059 12.950 0.050  203.602366 +30.489080 13.875 0.073  203.602369 +30.489075 14.791 0.135  203.602378 +30.489069 15.597 0.263    0.000000  +0.000000  0.000 0.000
SE     203.599149 +30.482443  8.983 0.037  203.599136 +30.482466 12.957 0.046  203.599074 +30.482487 13.924 0.067  203.599016 +30.482464 14.868 0.129  203.598887 +30.482470 15.683 0.265    0.000000  +0.000000  0.000 0.000
S      203.591434 +30.479729  8.963 0.039  203.591450 +30.479752 12.946 0.049  203.591394 +30.479799 13.898 0.073  203.591369 +30.479843 14.858 0.141    0.000000  +0.000000  0.000 0.000    0.000000  +0.000000  0.000 0.000
SW     203.583758 +30.482515  8.941 0.038  203.583764 +30.482542 12.960 0.048  203.583728 +30.482553 13.870 0.066  203.583722 +30.482540 14.780 0.123  203.583847 +30.495829 15.536 0.240    0.000000  +0.000000  0.000 0.000
W      203.580599 +30.489136  8.964 0.036  203.580605 +30.489178 12.924 0.048  203.580582 +30.489208 13.864 0.072  203.580624 +30.489237 14.812 0.140    0.000000  +0.000000  0.000 0.000    0.000000  +0.000000  0.000 0.000
NW     203.583838 +30.495731  8.979 0.036  203.583854 +30.495770 12.944 0.046  203.583812 +30.495796 13.875 0.068  203.583831 +30.495808 14.766 0.125  203.583847 +30.495829 15.536 0.240    0.000000  +0.000000  0.000 0.000

8 Pixel Separation Results

The following images show Ks Atlas Images with the artifical stars of different brightnesses at 8 pixel (16") separation from the primary star.

The table below lists the extracted source positions and Ks photometry for the primary and artificial stars in each simulation, as above. All of the artificial stars were detected down to the 15th magnitude case, but only one of the 16th magnitude simulated stars was detected. There was no 17th magnitude run at this separation. As above, the simulated scans were not calibrated so there is a +0.03 mag offset from the actual photometric scale.

| src |   ra09   |  dec09   | mag09|msig09|  ra13    |  dec13   | mag13|msig13|  ra14    |  dec14   | mag14|msig14|  ra15    |  dec15   | mag15|msig15|   ra16   |  dec16   | mag16|msig16|
| char| double   |  double  |double|double| double   |  double  |double|double| double   |  double  |double|double| double   |  double  |double|double| double   |  double  |double|double|
master 203.591491 +30.489061  7.975 0.039  203.591478 +30.489063  7.965 0.037  203.591481 +30.489069  7.977 0.037  203.591482 +30.489067  7.977 0.037  203.591481 +30.489065  7.964 0.037
N      203.591521 +30.493492  8.971 0.038  203.591499 +30.493536 12.883 0.058  203.591505 +30.493528 13.832 0.093  203.591519 +30.493496 14.679 0.167    0.000000  +0.000000  0.000 0.000
NE     203.594716 +30.491829  8.984 0.038  203.594681 +30.491867 12.957 0.051  203.594678 +30.491871 13.962 0.083  203.594672 +30.491859 14.933 0.178    0.000000  +0.000000  0.000 0.000
E      203.596623 +30.489059  8.972 0.036  203.596581 +30.489115 12.947 0.050  203.596571 +30.489119 13.969 0.083  203.596521 +30.489101 14.982 0.188    0.000000  +0.000000  0.000 0.000
SE     203.594696 +30.486320  8.969 0.034  203.594654 +30.486347 13.001 0.052  203.594629 +30.486334 14.060 0.085  203.594675 +30.486219 15.132 0.202    0.000000  +0.000000  0.000 0.000
S      203.591470 +30.484678  8.964 0.039  203.591409 +30.484726 12.899 0.053  203.591374 +30.484728 13.844 0.080  203.591304 +30.484726 14.671 0.138    0.000000  +0.000000  0.000 0.000
SW     203.588282 +30.486349  8.961 0.039  203.588259 +30.486393 12.913 0.049  203.588285 +30.486389 13.899 0.074  203.588351 +30.486376 14.826 0.151  203.588452 +30.486376 15.611 0.295
W      203.586363 +30.489111  8.948 0.038  203.586334 +30.489134 12.963 0.049  203.586347 +30.489092 14.017 0.078  203.586412 +30.488947 15.052 0.173    0.000000  +0.000000  0.000 0.000
NW     203.588311 +30.491856  8.986 0.037  203.588273 +30.491894 12.919 0.050  203.588270 +30.491888 13.918 0.078  203.588258 +30.491856 14.888 0.156    0.000000  +0.000000  0.000 0.000

5 Pixel Separation Result

The following images show Ks Atlas Images with the artifical stars of different brightnesses at 5 pixel (10") separation from the primary star.

The table below lists the extracted source positions and Ks photometry for the primary and artificial stars in each simulation, as above. All of the artificial stars were detected in both cases. As above, the simulated scans were not calibrated so there is a +0.03 mag offset from the actual photometric scale.

| src |   ra09   |  dec09   | mag09|msig09|  ra13    |  dec13   | mag13|msig13|  ra14    |  dec14   | mag14|msig14|  ra15    |  dec15   | mag15|msig15|
| char| double   |  double  |double|double| double   |  double  |double|double| double   |  double  |double|double| double   |  double  |double|double|
master 203.591491 +30.489059  7.958 0.043  203.591485 +30.489065  7.967 0.038  203.591481 +30.489071  7.974 0.037  203.591482 +30.489065  7.977 0.038
N      203.591516 +30.491837  8.960 0.060  203.591500 +30.491884 12.730 0.071  203.591512 +30.491922 13.585 0.093  203.591561 +30.491940 14.217 0.120
NE     203.593428 +30.490742  8.978 0.042  203.593402 +30.490746 12.719 0.078  203.593385 +30.490747 13.575 0.109  203.593428 +30.490738 14.214 0.151
E      203.594698 +30.489073  8.975 0.043  203.594644 +30.489130 12.821 0.068  203.594636 +30.489120 13.601 0.105  203.594431 +30.489075 14.115 0.147
SE     203.593413 +30.487431  8.938 0.043  203.593355 +30.487501 12.793 0.050  203.593351 +30.487507 13.725 0.080  203.593284 +30.487518 14.535 0.12
S      203.591489 +30.486332  8.938 0.049  203.591438 +30.486401 12.760 0.066  203.591421 +30.486437 13.585 0.087  203.591361 +30.486553 14.248 0.140
SW     203.589571 +30.487442  8.942 0.042  203.589542 +30.487507 12.852 0.103  203.589554 +30.487530 13.766 0.186  203.589526 +30.487602 14.658 0.280
W      203.588300 +30.489098  8.958 0.039  203.588268 +30.489161 12.961 0.035  203.588299 +30.489113 13.945 0.057  203.588294 +30.489256 14.896 0.152
NW     203.589585 +30.490738  8.940 0.050  203.589579 +30.490822 12.817 0.068  203.589607 +30.490774 13.681 0.084  203.589644 +30.490618 14.420 0.114

5 Pixel Star Circle Displaced + 15 Pixels Results

The table below lists the extracted positions and Ks magnitudes for the primary and 13th mag simulated sources in the rings displaced 15 pixels west (15w) and 15 pixels east (15e) of the primary star. The source names refer to the simulated star's location in their respective "rings", not their displacement from the primary star.

| src |   ra15w  |  dec15w  |mag15w|msig15|  ra15e   |  dec15e  |mag15e|msig15|
| char| double   |  double  |double|double| double   |  double  |double|double|
master 203.591482 +30.489067  7.977 0.037  203.591482 +30.489067  7.979 0.037
N      203.581840 +30.491940 12.928 0.062  203.601102 +30.491846 13.021 0.068
NE     203.583768 +30.490824 12.984 0.062  203.602992 +30.490747 12.923 0.058
E      203.585061 +30.489168 12.984 0.045  203.604285 +30.489077 12.955 0.052
SE     203.583747 +30.487513 12.942 0.048  203.602990 +30.487452 12.920 0.051
S      203.581823 +30.486427 12.949 0.058  203.601072 +30.486338 12.920 0.047
SW     203.579918 +30.487530 12.924 0.061  203.599144 +30.487453 12.963 0.048
W      203.578640 +30.489210 12.890 0.062  203.597877 +30.489100 12.983 0.064
NW     203.579932 +30.490852 12.879 0.052  203.599169 +30.490753 12.930 0.064

Summary

From Rae Stiening:

8/16/2000

Subject: Latest Admirals' club summary


  8th magnitude parent in center	No star in center	
	                                   5 pix circle
	17 pix	8 pix	5 pix		15 px W	15 pix E	
N	12.986	12.917	12.764		12.962	13.055	
ne	12.976	12.991	12.753		13.018	12.957	
E	12.984	12.981	12.855		13.018	12.989	
se	12.991	13.035	12.827		12.976	12.954	
S	12.980	12.923	12.794		12.983	12.954	
sw	12.994	12.947	12.886		12.958	12.997	
W	12.958	12.997	12.995		12.924	13.017	
nw	12.978	12.953	12.851		12.913	12.964
	
Average	12.981	12.968	12.841		12.969	12.986	

The above magnitudes have been corrected for the 0.034 offset so 13 is
the expected answer.

The fact that the no star in center 5 pixel radius circle gives the same
answer as the 17 pixel radius circle with an 8th magnitude star in the
center shows that the 13th magnitude stars do not contaminate each other
in the 5 pixel radius configuration.

Hence it appears that the 0.15 magnitude bias at the 5 pixel radius with
the bright star in the center is a result of contamination of the
photometry by the haze around the bright star.

Eric Howard has generated plots showing the brightness of the simulated stars as a function of separation from the parent star. Eric's description:

This set of graphs plot mags as a  funciton of distance from the
central star with appropriate error bars (1 sigma) for 9th, 13th, 
14th, and 15th magnitude secondary stars. Plots are now correctly 
labeled with pixels (not arc sec) and are plotted on the same
scale (+/- 1 mag). 
 
eric

R. Cutri - IPAC
Last Update - 18 August 2000