The following graphs show the dithering pattern produced by Eric Howard's latest suggested step size of 82.80" and a camera rotation angle of 0.02o. This produces a net rotation of:
| Band | Array Rotation (o) |
|---|---|
| J | 0.509 |
| H | 0.571 |
| K | 0.472 |
Using the following plate scales:
| Band | Plate Scale ("/pixel) |
|---|---|
| J | 1.9966 |
| H | 2.0060 |
| K | 1.9839 |
gives the following step sizes in pixels:
| Single Frame step in pixels | 6th frame step in pixels | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Band | In-scan | Cross-scan | In-scan | Cross-scan |
| J | 41.47 | 0.37 | 248.81 | 2.21 |
| H | 41.27 | 0.42 | 247.64 | 2.47 |
| K | 41.73 | 0.35 | 250.41 | 2.06 |
The resulting dither patterns are:
![]() (Click on graph for bigger and better image.) | ![]() (Click on graph for bigger and better image.) |
![]() (Click on graph for bigger and better image.) | ![]() (Click on graph for bigger and better image.) |
For comparison, here are the dithering patterns for two other minima found by Mike Skrutskie, at a step size of 81.59" and a rotation of 0.526o, on the left, and a step size of 82.60" and a rotation of 0.326o, on the right:
![]() (Click on graph for bigger and better image.) | ![]() (Click on graph for bigger and better image.) |
![]() (Click on graph for bigger and better image.) | ![]() (Click on graph for bigger and better image.) |
![]() (Click on graph for bigger and better image.) | ![]() (Click on graph for bigger and better image.) |